How Conflict Clarifier is built
Measured numbers
Counted by the collection, not written by hand. A figure we cannot support is left out rather than shown as zero.
- Pages
- 17,478
- Page count over time
- 15,308 → 17,478 pages measured, 30 Sep to 18 Oct
- Uptime
- 99.99% over 30 days
- Content last updated
- 17 Oct 2026
8th of 23 measured in Legal/Civic, by sitemap URLs
From the public status feed
As reported by the site itself
How it is built, by role
The same roles apply across the whole collection. Nothing in this block is specific to this site; what the site says about itself is quoted word for word below it.
- 1
Edge network
Visitors reach a site through an edge layer: a content delivery network with a web application firewall in front of it.
- 2
Application host
The edge talks to an application host that serves the site and renders its pages.
- 3
Data
What the pages show comes from a relational database or, for a site pre-rendered at build time, from data files built into its release.
- 4
Scheduled measurement
The collection measures its sites on a schedule: content dates and site health nightly, page counts read from each site’s sitemap weekly. Every reading is kept with its date. A site too large to re-walk is not re-measured, and shows no trend.
- 5
Public status feed
A monitoring panel sends a signed report on uptime, deploys and backups once a day, and the Operations page publishes it. A figure on this page that comes from that report says so.
In the site's own words
Each passage is copied unaltered from a page the site publishes, with the address it was taken from and the date we took it. We add nothing between them.
“A multi-perspective conflict intelligence platform — built to help readers, journalists, students, and researchers see how the same event is reported from different sides, without the noise of propaganda or partisan certainty.”
“ConflictClarifier ingests articles, government statements, OSINT reports, market data, and humanitarian releases from a fixed list of public sources. We cluster reports about the same event into a single canonical record, attach the source list, and present a neutral summary alongside framings from up to six perspectives so readers can compare how the event is being told.”
“Every event, claim, and figure on the site carries a verification status, a source count, and a last-reviewed timestamp. Methodology pages explain how those labels are assigned and what their limits are.”
“The site is built for readers who want to understand a conflict beyond the news cycle: students, researchers, journalists, NGO staff, traders pricing risk, civil servants, and members of affected diasporas.”
